The most important question I believe that anyone can ask in their life is ‘Who is Jesus Christ?’. Straight away we are confronted with lots of questions. ‘How do I find out about Jesus?’, ‘Can an ancient bible really give historically reliable evidence?’ ‘Roberts has put together an excellent, very readable, and accessible book without losing any of the quality of scholarship in the process’. In 1981, the late scholar F.F. Bruce published a book on the reliability of the New Testament called ‘The New Testament documents: Are they reliable?’. The book became a classic of its time for understanding the world of the New Testament, and how it came to be written. In 2007, Harvard scholar Mark D.
Bible
Posted on October 30, 2011
by Rich Spear
Categories: Bible, Faith, Character of God, Jesus, Religion
Bad Experience?
This is a commonly asked question, which often betrays a pre-supposition: having to go to church is tantamount to a life sentence in prison. Many people like the idea of a personal connection with God, but that’s my experience, right? What does my spirituality have to do with a load of other strangers?
There may be many reasons that you could think that. It could be that you were brought up going to a church which frankly made joining a crown green bowling club seem exciting (I can relate!!). It might be that you had a bad experience with some Christians before, that left you feeling hurt or rejected. Does this mean you should reject church for good?
'This is not an optional extra for those that are extra keen. We all belong in the local church. This is where we will thrive, to accomplish what God has made us for!'
Posted on November 28, 2010
by Mark Hosmer
Categories: Bible, History, Jesus, Science
Scholars have been arguing over how to interpret the early parts of Genesis since at least the 3rd century (e.g. Origen c.185-c254), probably earlier. This is such an ongoing debate because it’s very difficult to come to concrete conclusions on certain aspects. Two common areas of uncertainty are creation, and the flood.
With the flood/Noah's ark, it might be helpful to break it down into a few parts and give a quick overview of each.
Is the flood described in the Bible using Global or Local language?
Did the flood cover the entire Earth, or just the region where Noah lived? For those that believe the Bible to be the word of God (myself included) this is an important question. It is very easy to come to conclusions based on particular words or phrases, but most of us rely on a translation of the original language. Does the intended meaning come across in the translation?
The flood account is one of the few areas in the Bible where this is unclear, experts in Hebrew are still debating subtleties in the language.
Posted on October 10, 2010
by Ruth Preston
Categories: Bible, History, Jesus
At face value it may seem strange that Matthew and Luke record different genealogies of Jesus. Many, including Richard Dawkins in The God Delusion, and Islamic apologist Shabbir Ally (Further Reading 4), have alluded to this comparison when accusing the Bible of contradiction.
However, these genealogies can be better understood with some general background information:
Biblical Genealogies
Biblical genealogies have different properties from the family trees that we are familiar with today.
Firstly, Biblical genealogies use the terms ‘son’ and ‘father’ loosely. They can mean either direct descendent or distant descendent. For example, we read in Luke 3:8 and John 8:39 that a group of religious teachers said to Jesus, ‘Abraham is our father’, which is absurd in the modern sense, since Abraham lived thousands of years before. Similarly, Jesus is described throughout the New Testament as ‘the son of David’ (Matthew 1:1), who lived hundreds of years before Jesus was born.
Posted on April 12, 2010
by Edward Rhodes
Categories: Bible, Jesus, Lifestyle Issues
"Judge not, lest ye be judged”
What a beautiful refrain
The studio audience disagrees
Have his lambs all gone astray?
(REM, New Test Leper)
As the above song lyrics illustrate, Matthew 7:1 is a verse which resonates in our culture and is familiar to people outside the Christian church. But what does it mean? Does it, as Leo Tolstoy suggested, mean that law courts should be abolished? Does it forbid criticism or negative evaluation of another person’s beliefs or lifestyle? How should those who profess to be followers of Jesus Christ seek to apply this message to their own lives?
The immediate context: Remove the log from your own eye
Posted on January 27, 2010
by Ruth Preston
Categories: Bible, Character of God, Lifestyle Issues
In the final part of this trilogy of articles we will be considering what it means to be 'a helper' and whether all that we have discussed in the previous two articles is relevant today, or should this be adapted for cultural reasons?
To view the previous two articles on this subject please click here.
Specific role for women: Helper
When God created woman it is recorded that God said: ‘It is not good that the man should be alone, I will make a helper fit for (or corresponding to) him’ (Genesis 2:18). The original Hebrew (the language the Old Testament is translated from) for ‘helper’ is ‘ezer kenegdo’ in Genesis 2:18 could literally be translated as ‘a helper as corresponding to/opposite him’ from ‘ezer’ (help), ‘ke-‘ (as, like), ‘neged’ (opposite, corresponding to), ‘-o’ (him). ‘A helper opposite and corresponding’ to Adam is a good translation.
Therefore Eve was not inferior to Adam. The fact that the word ‘help’ (ezer) is often used to refer to an action of God is interesting, and illustrates the fact that both male and female roles derive from God. For example:
Posted on January 18, 2010
by Ruth Preston
Categories: Bible, Character of God, Lifestyle Issues, Religion
In our previous article on this subject from December 2009, the Christian view of men and women was discussed, and their equal standing before God and each other. In the next two articles the nature and relationship between spiritual and functional equality will be developed; this article focussing on the role of men. Within the evangelical church today people take different theological positions on this matter, generally falling into two camps; Complementarianism (Often called Subordinationism by those opposed) and Egalitarianism. The objective of this text is not to create an in-depth comparative study between the two (if you wish to research the topics, I have supplied links at the end of Part 3), but to present a coherent summary of the biblical teaching regarding the role of men, considering the relevant biblical passages in context historically, and within the Bible as a whole.
Governing the church
Posted on January 11, 2010
by Edward Rhodes
Categories: Bible, Faith, Jesus, Religion
Originally there was only one Church, founded by the apostles. This was, from time to time, challenged by various groups who claimed to represent 'true' Christianity, but which rejected key teachings of the faith, an issue which I hope to touch on below. In 1054 A.D. the Church split into Eastern (Orthodox) and Western (Catholic) churches due to divisions over the precise relationship of the Holy Spirit to the other persons of the Trinity (the Filioque controversy) and the authority of the Pope/Bishop of Rome. The Western church was further split into Roman Catholics and Protestants at the time of the Reformation, and splits along denominational lines (especially among Protestants) have continued ever since. It could be argued that this disunity is a barrier to the credibility of the Christian message.
Not all disagreements are of equal importance
Posted on December 07, 2009
by Ruth Preston
Categories: Bible, Lifestyle Issues
The Bible and Feminism
Posted on December 04, 2009
by Edward Rhodes
Categories: Bible, Faith, History, Jesus, Religion
Introduction
Christians believe that Jesus is the Son of God, and not merely a human teacher. This central idea has long been challenged by opponents of Christianity, and opposition has again, in recent years, come to prominence with the appearance of books such as The Da Vinci Code by Dan Brown.
Jesus was a man
Of course, at the very outset of this discussion, it is worth remembering that Christians also believe that Jesus was a real flesh-and-blood man. There were some early teachers (such as the “Docetists” and “Gnostics”) who denied this, arguing instead that Jesus merely appeared to be human (see, for example, section 93 of the Acts of John). It is curious to see such documents being referred to as evidence of early Christian belief in a merely human Jesus (see, for example, pages 231 and 234 of The Da Vinci Code), when this is something that their authors denied.
The Council of Nicaea of 325 A.D.




